How do the rights of the accused differ in military courts?

When it comes to the rights of the accused in military courts, there are a number of differences compared to civilian courts. One key difference is the application of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which outlines the laws and procedures governing military justice.

One of the biggest differences between military and civilian courts is that military trials are often conducted by a panel of military officers rather than a jury of peers. Additionally, military defendants do not have the right to a public trial, and certain evidentiary rules are more lenient in military courts. For example, hearsay evidence may be admitted in military trials if the statements were made under certain circumstances.

However, military defendants do have certain constitutional rights, such as the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. They also have the right to a speedy trial, and if convicted, they have the right to appeal their case to higher military courts and ultimately to the U.S. Supreme Court.