How does the New Objectivity movement compare to the Surrealist movement in their approach to politics and society?

The New Objectivity and Surrealist movements were two important art movements of the early 20th century that emerged in Europe. While both movements emerged as a reaction to the political and social upheavals of the time, they approached these issues in different ways.

The New Objectivity movement was characterized by a realistic style that emphasized the objective representation of reality. The movement was politically conservative and rejected the emotionalism and subjectivity of earlier art movements. The artists associated with the movement sought to create works that were objective and rational, and that reflected the social and political realities of the time.

The Surrealist movement, on the other hand, was characterized by a rejection of rationality and a celebration of the irrational and the unconscious. Surrealist artists sought to break down the boundaries between the conscious and the unconscious, and to explore the hidden realms of the mind. The movement was politically radical and sought to overthrow the established order.

Thus, while both movements were a response to the social and political upheavals of the time, they approached these issues in very different ways, with the New Objectivity emphasizing objective reality and the Surrealists emphasizing the subjective and irrational.