Which historical inaccuracies can be found in the Viking TV series, and how do they affect the overall story?

The popular TV series Vikings, which premiered in 2013, has been praised for its engaging storyline and compelling characters. However, the series is not without its historical inaccuracies, which have sparked debate among historians and fans alike.

One of the most significant inaccuracies in the series is its portrayal of the shieldmaidens, female warriors who fight alongside the male warriors. While there is evidence of some women in Viking society taking part in battles, the idea of the shieldmaiden as a common occurrence is largely a myth.

Another inaccuracy in the series is its portrayal of the Vikings as dirty, uncivilized barbarians. While the Vikings were known for their raiding and pillaging, they were also skilled craftsmen and traders who had a complex social hierarchy.

The series also takes some liberties with the timeline of events and the historical figures it portrays. For example, Ragnar Lothbrok, one of the main characters in the series, is believed by some historians to be a legendary figure rather than a real person.

Despite these inaccuracies, the series has been praised for its overall attention to historical detail and its ability to bring the Viking Age to life. While the inaccuracies may bother some historians and fans, they do not necessarily detract from the overall quality of the series.