Which series has better exploration of politics and power: Lord of the Rings or Harry Potter?

Both Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter are iconic fantasy series that explore complex themes such as politics and power. While Lord of the Rings primarily focuses on politics and power struggles in the context of warfare, Harry Potter explores these themes within a magical society, with a particular focus on corruption and authoritarianism.

In Lord of the Rings, power is primarily explored through the quest for the One Ring, which grants immense power to its bearer. The series explores the corrupting influence of power and the struggle to resist its pull. Political power struggles also feature heavily in the series, as various factions compete for control of Middle Earth.

On the other hand, Harry Potter explores politics and power in the context of a magical society with its own governing bodies, such as the Ministry of Magic. The series explores the corruption and abuse of power within these institutions, and the struggle to resist authoritarianism. Harry and his friends are often pitted against those in positions of power, who seek to oppress and control those they see as inferior.

Ultimately, both series provide valuable insights into the nature of politics and power, and the ways in which they can be abused. While Lord of the Rings focuses more on the corrupting influence of power and the struggle to resist its pull, Harry Potter explores the dangers of authoritarianism and the importance of standing up against oppression.