Who has better representation of disabilities: Frodo or Neville?

Both Frodo Baggins from J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings and Neville Longbottom from J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series are characters with disabilities who have captured the hearts of readers worldwide. While they have different disabilities, they both represent individuals who are often overlooked in popular fiction.

Frodo Baggins is a hobbit with a chronic pain condition caused by the wound he received from a Morgul blade. This pain is debilitating at times, but Frodo manages to continue on his quest despite his limitations. Neville Longbottom has a condition called dyspraxia, which affects his coordination and motor skills. However, Neville is able to overcome this disability and become a skilled wizard in his own right.

Both characters show that individuals with disabilities can still be heroes and accomplish great things. However, it's difficult to compare the two characters in terms of their representation of disabilities. Frodo's chronic pain is more visible and affects him throughout the story, while Neville's dyspraxia is less central to his character arc. Ultimately, both characters are important examples of disability representation in popular fiction.