Why do some people consider video games as not real art?

Video games have been around for several decades now and have become a massive industry, generating billions of dollars in revenue every year. Despite the artistic and technical advancements made in video game development, there are still some people who don't consider video games as real art.

One of the reasons is that video games are often perceived as mere entertainment, lacking the depth and meaning associated with traditional art forms such as painting, sculpture, or literature. Some people view video games as shallow and focused more on providing instant gratification than evoking deep emotions or ideas.

Another reason is that video games are relatively new compared to other art forms, and many people may not have grown up with them or have had the opportunity to explore them in the same way they have with other art forms. As such, video games may not hold the same cultural significance or historical value as other forms of art.

Furthermore, the interactive nature of video games, where the player is an active participant in the experience, can blur the line between art and entertainment. Some people argue that the player's agency takes away from the artist's creative control and the intended message of the work.

Despite these reasons, many others argue that video games are indeed a form of art. Video games can convey complex narratives, explore profound themes, and evoke strong emotional responses from players. Moreover, video games are a collaborative effort involving artists, musicians, writers, programmers, and designers who create stunning visuals, music, stories, and game mechanics.

It's important to note that art is subjective, and people's opinions about what constitutes art can differ widely. While some people may not consider video games as real art, others see them as a vital and legitimate art form that deserves recognition and respect.