How do the paintings of the Impressionists and the Fauvists compare in terms of color and light?

Impressionism and Fauvism are two major art movements that emerged in France during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. While both movements are characterized by the use of bright colors and bold brushwork, there are some notable differences in terms of their approach to color and light.

Impressionists such as Claude Monet, Pierre-Auguste Renoir, and Edgar Degas, were interested in capturing the fleeting effects of light and color in their paintings. They often used broken brushstrokes and a limited palette of colors to create the impression of natural light. Impressionist paintings typically have a soft, atmospheric quality that emphasizes the play of light and shadow.

Fauvism, on the other hand, is known for its bold and vivid use of color. Fauvist artists like Henri Matisse, André Derain, and Maurice de Vlaminck were less concerned with capturing the natural effects of light, and instead used color to express emotion and create a sense of movement. Fauvist paintings often have a flattened, two-dimensional quality that emphasizes the decorative use of color and shape.

In summary, while both Impressionism and Fauvism are characterized by their use of bright colors and brushwork, Impressionist paintings tend to emphasize the natural effects of light and color, while Fauvist paintings use color to create a sense of emotion and movement.